Terror,
Love, and the State of the World
John
Robbins
When
there is as much terror afoot as there has been since September
11th, it is hard to see how love might prevail.
This is how it is with us human beings when we are afraid: We
contract. Our breathing becomes shallow and constricted.Concerns
for our immediate survival push everything else out of the
picture.In the throes of terror, our thinking is narrowed and
short-term. The world is divided into two kinds of people, those
who are threats and those who can help us defend against the
threat. Everyone else is seen as irrelevant, and might as well
not exist. All our attention is focused on protecting ourselves
from the immediate danger. Our thoughts become dominated by
“fight or flight,” triggering the reptilian part of our
brain to take over. If we can’t successfully flee, then we
must fight. It’s kill or be killed. Nothing else matters.
That’s the mindset of terror. That’s what fear does to
us.It’s a stateof consciousness that’s been widespread in
our nation since the horrifying and tragic attacks of September
11th.
In Time magazine’s special issue about the terrorist
attacks, the concluding essay was titled, “The Case for Rage
and Retribution.”The author of this piece, frequent Time
contributor Lance Morrow, called for “hatred,” and “a
policy of focused brutality.”He was far from alone in speaking
of the virtues of rage and retaliation.On Fox News Channel,
Bill O’Reilly said “the U.S. should bomb the Afghan
infrastructure to rubble — the airport, the power plants,
their water facilities and the roads.”As far as the civilian
population of Afghanistan, O’Reilly said, “If they don’t
rise up against this criminal government, they starve,
period.”Calling for the U.S. to massively attack not only
Afghanistan, but also Iraq and Libya, he added, “Let them eat
sand.” Meanwhile, the former executive editor of the New
York Times, A. M. Rosenthal, said we should issue ultimatums
to six nations, including Iran, Syria and the Sudan, and then,
if they don’t comply to our satisfaction within 72 hours,
follow up with massive bombing. New York Post columnist
Steve Dunleavy was also something besides coolheaded, saying
“As for cities or countries that host these worms, bomb them
into basketball courts.”The editor of National Review,
writing in the Washington Post, concurred, adding, “If
we flatten part of Damascus or Tehran or whatever it takes, that
is part of the solution.”
With the sounds of such war drums reverberating through the
American psyche, polls show that 80% support not only the use of
ground troops in Afghanistan, but also military action against
other countries in the Middle East.
I am no stranger to the desire for revenge. Like President
George W. Bush, and most likely like you, I have felt it surge
through me in recent weeks.Contemplating what took place on
September 11th, are there any among us who have not, at least
momentarily, felt their blood boil with outrage, and with the
demand that these mass murderers and all those behind them pay
with an eye for an eye?
But at such times, when our hearts are filled with outrage
and our eyes look everywhere for revenge, it is extraordinarily
important that we remember the awesome truth behind Gandhi’s
prophetic statement:“An eye for an eye will only make the
whole world blind.”
This is the very truth that the Osama bin Ladens of the world
would want us to forget.They would like us to be so lost in
hysteria that we can’t think straight.They would like us to be
so terrified, so anxious, so belligerent, that we lose
perspective and make rash and destructive decisions.If we stay
within the bubble of our fear, then the bin Ladens of the world
will have won.
Sometimes we need to take a very long, very slow, and very
deep breath, to restore our mental balance and ability to
function with clarity. There is a difference between enraged
action and wise, effective response.
Of course we should find the people and organizations
responsible for the attacks of September 11th, and the
subsequent anthrax mailings, and any other attempts that might
yet be made to terrorize our nation.We should find them, destroy
their networks, and bring them to justice.By no means should we
tolerate or excuse their actions, much less allow them to
continue.These are people not the slightest bit interested in
giving peace a chance.The possibility that they might acquire
and use nuclear weapons is unfortunately all too real.If we fail
to track them down and uproot them, we may find ourselves in
even worse shoes than the European who wrote, after World War
II, “We who live beneath a sky still streaked with the smoke
of crematoria have paid a high price to find out that evil is
really evil.”
But as we work to uproot the terrorists and their networks,
we must be careful to do so without escalating the cycle of
violence, and without causing the deaths of even more innocent
people, for this would only deepen the anger and rage already
extant in our world. Burning down the haystack is not the best
way to find the needle, especially when, in the effort, you
might set the barn, and the whole world, on fire. We must bring
those responsible to justice without jeopardizing our ability to
create a world where terrorism won’t take root, a world where
criminal psychopaths find no followers, a world where hatred has
no lure.
This is no small task, but it is the task before us.Our
leaders are wise in working to form a multinational coalition to
fight terrorism.But this should not be merely a coalition of
countries who allow the U.S. military the use of their airspace,
or the use of their airports, or provide other military
support.No coalition to defeat terrorism can be ultimately
successful unless it is also a coalition of countries joining
together to build a peaceful, just and prosperous world.Our
coalition to defeat terrorism will do only half of its job if it
merely seeks to defeat those who are responsible for the attacks
of September 11th.It must also work to build a world of
international cooperation, a world where no part of the greater
human family is left out or marginalized.
Approximately 6,000 people perished in the September 11th
attacks.Our nation reels from that despicable brutality.But
those who died from the attacks on that tragic day were not
alone.On September 11th, 35,000 children worldwide died of
hunger.A similar number of children died on September 12th,and
again on the 13th, and on every single day since then.Meanwhile,
we in the U.S. feed 80% of our grain harvest to livestock so
that a people whose cholesterol levels are too high can have
cheap meat.
To advance human security and control terrorism, we must not
only find the brutality of the September 11th attacks to be
totally intolerable.We must also find intolerable that one
billion people worldwide struggle to survive on $1 a day, that
more than one billion people lack access to safe drinking water,
and that 3 billion people have inadequate access to sanitation.
The presence of such dire poverty is an insult to human
dignity and would be deplorable enough.But today, with worldwide
telecommunications making the rising inequality between a rich,
powerful and imposing West and the rest of the world visible to
all, its continued existence can only spur those who have no
prospect of a better life to previously unheard of levels of
despair and rage.In a time when a handful of desperate and
suicidal people can devastate the most militarily powerful
nation in the history of humankind, any coalition dedicated to
defeating terrorism must also be a coalition dedicated to the
goal of bringing justice and prosperity to the poor and
dispossessed. If we are serious about stopping terrorism, then
our goal must be to reduce the level of pollution, fear, and
poverty in the world.
If this is truly our goal, and if we devote our actions and
resources to its accomplishment, the support for the bin Ladens
of the world will inexorably evaporate.People who would have
otherwise sided with the terrorists will be clamoring to tell us
who and where they are, and to help us find and defeat them.
This goal is too costly, many say.But this is not true.The
cost of our initial military response will easily top $100
billion (on top of our already enormous annual defense budget of
$342 billion).What could we accomplish if we spent even a small
fraction of that much on programs to alleviate human suffering?
In 1998, the United Nations Development Program estimated
that it would cost an additional $9 billion (above current
expenditures) to provide clean water and sanitation for everyone
on earth. It would cost an additional $12 billion, they said, to
cover reproductive health services for all women
worldwide.Another $13 billion would be enough not only to give
every person on Earth enough food to eat but also basic health
care.An additional $6 billion could provide basic education for
all.
These are large numbers, but combined they add up to $40
billion — only one fifth as much as the $200 billion the U.S.
government agreed in October 2001 to pay Lockheed to build new
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) jets.
Our government leaders have not hesitated to build an
international coalition and to spend hundreds of billions of
dollars to defeat those who launched the attacks of September
11th.What if we were equally as dedicated to building an
international coalition to eradicate hunger, to provide clean
water, to defeat infectious disease, to provide adequate jobs,
to combat illiteracy, and to end homelessness?What if we
understood that, today, there is no such thing as national
security as long as the basic human needs of large portions of
humanity are not met?In today’s world made transparent by
television and other telecommunications, any country that
attains prosperity unshared by its fellow nations can only breed
resentment and hatred.
Most immediately, we must address what is rapidly becoming an
overwhelming humanitarian problem in Afghanistan.This nation has
endured decades of conflict. As a result, there are millions of
people there who, even before our bombing campaign began, were
dependent on food aid.Now, they face the prospect of imminent
starvation.According to United Nations experts, this is the most
severe humanitarian emergency ever.
The U.S. government has made much of C-17 cargo planes
dropping 20,000 food packets a day to Afghan civilians.But
according to world hunger relief organizations active in
Afghanistan such as Oxfam, the program has been a dismal
failure.The president of one of the world’s most prestigious
aid organizations, Doctors Without Borders, speaking from
Islamabad, deplored the program as so much “PR.”The
airdrops, he said, are a huge waste of money.The packages,
containing enough to feed an adult for a day, land all over the
place, with no guarantee that they will be retrieved. Many land
in the midst of landmines.And the amount being dropped is
insignificant is a country where seven or eight million people
are in danger of starvation. The money ($25 million according to
U.S. government sources) would be far better spent provisioning
the regular aid convoys already in action.
There is a terrible irony here.The United States has long
been a major supplier of food aid to Afghanistan.But now it is
U.S. bombing that is destroying roads and making it impossible
for substantial food aid to be delivered.If we were to make a
dramatic effort, now, to get meaningful amounts of emergency
relief to these people, it would make a great difference to
their survival.If we don’t, it will only cement in the minds
of the world’s masses the image of the U.S. as indifferent to
the needs of the poor.
While the vast majority of Americans care deeply about the
welfare of their fellow human beings, the foreign policies of
the U.S. government have for some time now been seen by much of
the rest of the world as arrogant and selfish.And it is a sad
fact that we have far too often given them cause for such a
view.It is hard to be proud of our country for standing nearly
alone among nations in refusing to sign the treaty banning land
mines; for being one of only four nations (the others are Libya,
Syria and Iraq) who refuse to comply with a global treaty to
eliminate chemical weapons; and for almost single-handedly
blocking U.N. efforts to reduce the use of children as soldiers,
even when two million children have been killed in armed
conflicts in the past decade.
Our nation has also done many wonderful and generous things.
We have at times behaved with honor among nations, and been a
beacon of freedom. But the world has seen our other side,
too.It’s not easy to feel grateful to the United States for
being one of only two nations (the other is Somalia) to refuse
to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, and
one of only three nations (the others are Libya and Iraq) to
oppose the U.N. being able to investigate and prosecute
genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes such as rape
and sexual slavery.
There is an enormous disconnect taking place between the will
of the American people and the foreign policy of our government.
The American people are for the most part honest, decent, and
compassionate. But few U.S. citizens are aware of how much U.S.
foreign policies have betrayed our caring and our humanity.How
many Americans know that we are far and away the world’s
leading arms merchant?Or that, in the last fifteen years, the
U.S. share of the worlds arms trade has increased from 16% to
more than 70%? How many Americans know that even before
September 11th we were spending 18 times more money on the
military than the combined spending of all of the nations
identified by the U.S. government as potential enemies (Cuba,
Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, and Syria)?
President Bush began his term by
withdrawing from almost every multilateral agreement and
international treaty that came up, except those that in the
short term served to enhance American profits and power.From the
outset, his administration angered and alienated the world
community by disengaging from treaties attempting to deal with
global warming, nuclear disarmament, population control,
trafficking in small arms, and chemical and biological weapons,
to name just a few.
This is not a matter of partisanship.Both Republican and
Democrat administrations have come all too often to define
American self-interest almost without regard for the concerns of
other nations. It’s sad but true that to assure American
access to oil and other natural resources around the world, and
to provide a constant pool of cheap labor, the U.S. government
has frequently supported undemocratic and repressive regimes
that have been hated by their own populations. We have massively
supported governments that have engaged in widespread terrorism
against their own people.Instead of supporting human rights and
self determination, we’ve sold hundreds of billions of dollars
of weapons to a string of tyrannical governments as long as
doing so provided us with cheap oil and access to their markets.
But now, suddenly, we are realizing that we desperately need
the help of the world.There are signs of hope. As a London
newspaper recently commented, “Colin Powell, in a stunning and
rare display of humility for an American official, now
acknowledges that in order to fight terrorism effectively the
U.S. is going to have to be more sensitive to the concerns of
other cultures.”
Might the United States remember in all of this that our
national purpose is greater than the construction of a McWorld,
and that we have a deep and paramount interdependence with the
wellbeing of all of the world’s peoples?As the president of
the State of the World Forum, Jim Garrison, puts it:“If out of
the present crisis the United Statesemerges more connected with
the rest of the world, more willing to live cooperatively within
coalitions than outside them, then light will have truly come
from out of the darkness and redemption out of the recesses of
hatred and war.In one of the deepest paradoxes of contemporary
history, the present crisis might compel America to… (realize)
no country is an island unique unto itself…and the only
solution to hate is to stop the underlying causes that produce
it, working within the community of nations to achieve goals
that benefit the poor as well as the rich, the south as well as
the north, the developing nations as well as those more
advanced.Achieving this, America will fulfill the deepest
yearning of one of its founding fathers, Benjamin Franklin, who
wrote that he believed the real destiny of America would not be
about power; it would be about light.”
Will the day come when the United States fulfills our true
national purpose and achieves lasting national security?
We’ll know we’ve begun when we break our addiction to
oil, and develop an economy based instead on hydrogen, wind
power, solar power, and other non-polluting, safe and renewable
sources of energy.
We’ll know we’ve begun to create true national security
when we define the greatness of our civilization not by our
military capabilities, not by our ability to inflict massive
damage and punishment, but by our ability to bring out the best
in ourselves and others, and by the quality of life we leave our
children.
We’ll know we’ve begun when we stop thinking there is
such a thing as “smart” bombs or “sophisticated”
weapons.“Sophisticated” means having the ability to use our
intelligence, empathy and imagination to solve serious and
complex problems.“Smart” means realizing that when these
bombs kill civilians they leave them just as dead, their
families just as heartbroken and enraged, the spiritual fabric
of the world just as shredded, and the human heart just as
violated.
We’ll know we’ve begun to defeat terrorism when we see
the connection between the $5 trillion the U.S. has spent on
nuclear weapons since World War II and the homeless children
shivering in the cold, the battered women who have no shelters,
and the families broken by grinding poverty; when we see the
connection between the $1 billion a day we’ve spent every day
for decades on the military and the hungry people who have no
hope, the children dying from preventable diseases, and the
families who sell their daughters into sexual slavery because
they see no other way to survive.We’ll know we’ve begun to
create a world where terrorism can’t find a foothold when we
commit ourselves and our resources to the building of a peaceful
world with as much dedication as we’ve committed ourselves to
war.
We’ll know we’re on the right track when we begin
producing and eating food that is healthy for our bodies and
healthy for the Earth, and when we no longer find acceptable the
existence of human hunger anywhere on the planet.
We’ll know we’re upholding the human spirit when the
power we seek is the ability to nurture and befriend, rather
than to conquer and subjugate; and when the success we pursue is
one in which all beings share because it is founded on reverence
for life.
We’ll know we’ve begun to create a safer and kinder world
when we design our public policies and personal lifestyles not
just for individual advantage, but for the greater good of the
whole Earth community. Then we will ask God to please hear the
prayers of the people in prison, of the homeless, of the
refugees walking on roads because a war has forced them from
their homes.We will ask God to hear the prayers of those who
hunger and are not fed, and those who are despised by their
fellow humans because they are somehow different.We will ask God
to feel the exhaustion of those living too close to the edge of
their physical and spiritual resources.Then our religious and
spiritual lives will make us more human, more humble, and more
able to live with respect for all beings.
In times of fear, most people step back and wait to see what
others are going to do and what’s going to happen.Some people,
though, see the situation as an opportunity to step forward and
take a stand.The more of us who in our hearts and lives take a
stand for the creation of a thriving, just and sustainable way
of life for all, the less likely it is that the bin Ladens of
the world will accomplish their purposes, and the greater the
chance that it will be love and not fear that will prevail. Then
those who perished in the September 11th attacks will not have
died in vain, but will live on in the flourishing of human hope
and well-being.
The bitter historical events that came to fruition on
September 11th did not come from nowhere, but developed over
decades and even centuries.Likewise the peace and understanding
that we seek, and which alone will make us truly safe, need to
be nurtured and cultivated over generations of time.
It is to the planting, nurturing and harvesting of fruits
worthy of all that is good and beautiful in us that we must now,
as never before, dedicate our lives.Because now, as never
before, the world needs our wisdom, our cooperation, and our
understanding that all humanity is connected.
(John Robbins is the author of many best-sellers,
including Diet For A New America, and his recently released The
Food Revolution. He is the founder of EarthSave International,
and can be contacted through the website foodrevolution.org)
Email
this article to a friend: