
By JEFFREY
SIMPSON
Wednesday,
December 5, 2001 – Page A19
How much closer can Canada get to the U.S.? How much
more sovereignty will Canada cede?
Those questions were interesting ones before Sept.
11. They have now become urgent. Scarcely a week passes
without Canada's running to catch up with post-Sept. 11
U.S. priorities.
Canada's vulnerability -- or closeness, if you prefer
-- has never been more apparent. When a country does 85
per cent of its trade with another, when it has ceded
continental defence policy, when it has become a pop
cultural outpost, then that country scrambles to follow
the priorities of the dominant one.
Some years hence, Canadians will face such issues as
a common external tariff and use of the U.S. dollar,
because the forces of economic integration, regardless
of Sept. 11, are pushing us that way.
In the meantime, Sept. 11 has produced in Canada new
anti-terrorism legislation, refugee-screening and border
security measures, and military participation in the
Afghan campaign.
Now, at the senior levels of the Chrétien
government, the military wants even more integration. If
the military prevails, the new policy will represent the
most radical change in Canadian defence policy since the
Second World War.
Two weeks ago, Defence Minister Art Eggleton hinted
at these changes after meeting U.S. Defence Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld. "We certainly should do a little
updating in view of post-Sept. 11 and particularly how
we would relate to them in terms of the defence of the
continent and how they would relate to us."
What lay behind that rather anodyne comment was the
Canadian military's desire to get fully into bed with
its U.S. counterpart when the United States reorganizes
its command structure for "homeland security."
Not content with ensuring that Canadian personnel and
equipment can work seamlessly with the U.S. military --
what is called "interoperability" -- the
military wants Canada fully integrated into U.S. defence
structures for North America.
That kind of institutional integration is now
restricted to the North American Aerospace Defence
Command, the agency responsible for defending Canadian
and U.S. airspace. Canada and the U.S. have dozens of
agreements to co-operate; but only in NORAD is the
command structure integrated so that Canadians are
assigned military tasks for the entire continent.
NORAD is a binational institution based in the U.S.
and largely controlled by the U.S. military. But there
are a handful of senior Canadian officers there,
including the No. 2 ranking officer.
The Americans will soon decide whether NORAD or some
other command should take charge of "homeland
defence," including ground and naval forces.
Either way, the Canadian military believes Canada
would be better served by integrating its forces within
these U.S. structures, the hope being that Canadian
officers might have some influence on U.S. decisions.
The change would mean moving from
"interoperability" to full integration for all
air, ground and sea forces involved in continental
defence.
A meeting of Canadian and U.S. experts is scheduled
for next week to discuss these ideas, showing how fast
Sept. 11 is driving policy on both sides of the border.
The Canadian military is pressing forward with its
desires despite concerns elsewhere in the Chrétien
government about the wisdom of both the policy and the
haste with which it is being pursued.
There are concerns about the loss of sovereignty and
questions about how seriously Canadian views would be
taken within integrated command structures
overwhelmingly controlled by Americans.
The Canadian military says Canada must get inside
whatever military tent the Americans are designing;
critics say Canadian views will inevitably be
subordinated within that tent to the tent's designers.
The Prime Minister and cabinet colleagues may yet
knock Mr. Eggleton off course. The military's desire to
be accepted as full players by the Americans may be
deflected by the loss of sovereignty were Canadian
personnel and equipment to be integrated into the U.S.
command structure. Canada can fully co-operate in the
defence of North America without taking the step desired
by the Canadian military.
Then again, post-Sept. 11 has driven Canadian
harmonization further and faster than anyone would have
dreamed before the terrorist attacks. Perhaps the
Canadian military will seize on this climate to get its
way.
jsimpson@globeandmail.ca
|