Draft Peace Parks and Rotary Marketing Strategy

August 29, 2005

 

 

Dear Members,

 

As indicated in my message of August 8, I am pleased to submit (below) a first draft of a WGIPPA Peace Parks and Rotary Marketing Strategy for your consideration and discussion.  I believe that our challenge is to develop the best possible strategy to “sell the WGIPP peace park idea” (in simple terms), to advance international understanding, goodwill, and peace.  Your suggestions to improve the document will be appreciated.  I put this together rather quickly and I am not ‘married’ to any of the ideas contained in it, so please feel free to provide constructive criticism and forgive me if I strayed from our purpose J

 

I had hoped to provide this to you much sooner (but better late than never).  I will bring some extra copies to our meeting in Cardston tomorrow and hope that we might be able to have some at least preliminary discussion. 

 

Regards,

Bob Stewart stewartr [at] peace.ca

WATERTON-GLACIER INTERNATIONAL PEACE PARK ASSEMBLY (“WGIPPA”)

 

PEACE, PARKS AND ROTARY WORKING GROUP

 

DRAFT MARKETING STRATEGY

 

 

“I have a dream - a time when delegates from Rotary Peace Parks throughout the world will meet at Waterton- Glacier to celebrate Peace and Goodwill in a “Hands Across All Borders Ceremony”.  Mike Demaniuk , WGIPPA President (2002 - 2004)

 

BACKGROUND

 

Refer to Appendix 1 for a background to Peace, Parks and Rotary prepared by Robert Stewart , Rotary Club of Okotoks, September 2004.

 

The following highlights, pertinent to the development of a WGIPPA Marketing Strategy, are excerpted from that Appendix 1:

 

 

Borrowing from the experience and work on this issue by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources), the Peace Parks Foundation, WWF-International and the University for Peace, the objectives of this Peace Parks and Rotary initiative could include among other things:

-          To catalyze and collaborate

-          To empower, through capacity building

-          To develop, adopt, test and disseminate Best Practice Guidelines and a Code of Conduct

-          To facilitate the exchange of data and information

-          promote recognition and application of the Peace Park concept

-          develop a program of work for the next three to five years.

 

 

Objectives for Parks for Peace (excerpted from Transboundary protected areas for peace and co-operation, reference below in Appendix 1)


The identification/designation of Parks for Peace by the cooperating jurisdictions should include only those areas where the agreed management objectives explicitly recognise both a protected area purpose and a peace purpose.


Parks for Peace should be founded on the recognition that human security, good governance, equitable development and respect for human rights are interdependent and indivisible. Peace is best developed by addressing the root causes of conflict and by promoting sustainable development, the rule of law and adherence to human rights, whether civil, political, economic, social or cultural.


Specific objectives of Parks for Peace may include the following aspects:


(i) Supporting long-term co-operative conservation of biodiversity, ecosystem services, and natural and cultural values across boundaries;


(ii) Promoting landscape-level ecosystem management through integrated bio-regional land-use planning and management;


(iii) Building trust, understanding, reconciliation and co-operation between and among countries, communities, agencies and other stakeholders;


(iv) Preventing and/or resolving tension, including over access to natural resources;


(v) Promoting the resolution of armed conflict and/or reconciliation following armed conflict;


(vi) Sharing biodiversity and cultural resource management skills and experience, including co-operative research and information management;


(vii) Promoting more efficient and effective co-operative management programmes;


(viii)Promoting access to, and equitable and sustainable use of natural resources, consistent with national sovereignty; and


(ix) Enhancing the benefits of conservation and promoting benefit-sharing across boundaries among stakeholders.

 

Though the main motive for donors to act in this way has so far been better conservation, it could also be a means to promote regional co-operation during times of tension.


 
Good Practice Guidelines:


Guidance is set out under nine headings:


1. Identifying and promoting common values

2. Involving and benefiting local people

3. Obtaining and maintaining support of decision-makers

4. Promoting coordinated and co-operative activities

5. Achieving coordinated planning and protected area development

6. Developing co-operative agreements

7. Working towards funding sustainability

8. Monitoring and assessing progress

9. Dealing with tension or armed conflict

 

 

PREFACE TO PEACE PARKS AND ROTARY MARKETING STRATEGY

 

“… Rotarians believe that if there is failure in the avenue of international service, there may be no need for concern about the other avenues of service. …  and this book (“Seven Paths To Peace”) is presented in the hope and belief that there are thousands (now millions) of hands which up to now have not been lifted – but which now may be persuaded to row a new and firm course.”

 

This proposal is submitted within the spirit of the ‘Protocol To Guide Our Conversations And Relationships’ in Appendix 2 below.

 

The Peace Parks and Rotary Marketing Strategy purpose is to respond to three questions regularly asked at WGIPPA by Rotarians and others:

 

What do we want and need?

 

Is peace possible?

 

What can we do?

 

 

What Do We Want/Need?

 

Our wants and needs are relatively tightly focused.

 

A read of the background material indicates our collective WGIPPA desire to:

 

In this light, we need to:

 

Peace Parks, as typically envisioned, can be enriching safe havens or sanctuaries for self-actualization that give us a place to nurture our desire to become better people – to become what we are capable of becoming.  They can be places to build personal peace, family peace, community peace, regional peace and world peace.

 

Currently, even in rich countries like Canada and the United States , too many people feel fear, disconnection, disenfranchisement, and lack esteem and actualization. The path from the current needs deficit is three-fold:

 

  1. through information knowledge (education),
  2. through social intelligence, contacts and networks,
  3. through purposeful and shared action

 

We are blessed that Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park gives us a natural venue and opportunity to walk that path.

 

 

Is Peace Possible?

 

This is an important question because Rotarians and other people need to be able to visualize success, and to ‘know’ that any Initiative is ‘worth the cost’.

 

Peace and violence are measurable, manageable and relative.  For example, Canadian Culture Of Peace Program Members view it that Canadians live in a ‘continuum’ as follows:

 

                                                  C

                                                   a

                                                   n

                                                   a                  !

                                                   d                  !

                  I                                a                  !                                                      I

                  I--------i------i-------i------------!------------------------------------I

         Culture of                                            mid                                           Culture of
        War & Violence                                  point                                 Peace & Non-violence

     (high incidence of                                                                               (low incidence of
direct & indirect violence)                                                                 direct & indirect violence)  

The best test is: “what is the effect on the least privileged in society?”   This analogy is just to say that peace and violence is relative and our North American Culture is still more predominantly one of violence than peace (or stated more directly, “In North America, we live in a culture of violence”).  In any case, evidence points to the fact that we are significantly underachieving our potential, and far too many are suffering harm (including death) unnecessarily.  All the reader has to do is look at some recent news headlines.

For 100 years, Rotary has been optimistic that we can make a significant, positive difference in The advancement of international understanding, goodwill, and peace through a world fellowship of business and professional persons united in the ideal of service.”

 

The Fourth Object recognizes peace is relative, and relative peace is possible.

 

Success in the Fourth Object results in significantly reducing the human cost of direct and indirect violence.  There is a high degree of correlation of education, social intelligence skills and shared action with improving relationships, co-operation and violence prevention.  An investment of time, effort and/or money will provide superior rates of return to WGIPPA Rotarians through meeting our own actualization needs, and those of others that we share our experiences with.  There is also a high degree of correlation of this ‘social intelligence’ with success at school, work and home.  Furthermore, businesses are more successful in a more stable, social environment – governments also.

 

As R.I. President Herb Brown said at the Rotary International Conference in Calgary in June 1996, “Peace is possible, it is the most worthwhile cause and investment of our time, effort and money, and we should do something about it.” 

 

 

What Can We Do?

 

Every Rotarian (in fact, everyone) is a potential peace builder, peace educator and peace leader.  It is not fair or possible for one, or a small number of people, to be the leader(s) – accordingly, everyone is expected to share in the leadership, education and building.  This is the ultimate in democratic participation and empowerment.  We are all guides towards a better world for future generations.

 

The Symbol chosen to represent this Rotary Initiative is in the form of Peace Parks.  For millennia, humans have gone to the mountain tops to seek inspiration and clear thought on their problems and issues.  Humans have also gone to the mountains to seek solace in nature’s beauty.    

 

Rotary’s motto is “Service Above Self”.  We, at WGIPPA, are well placed to provide servant leadership to build on past effort and a powerful symbol of friendship, taking WGIPPA to a higher level to make a more significant difference, to build transboundary co-operation and relationships at home and abroad, in service to humanity, our planet and Rotary’s Fourth Object.

 

In this light, we need to develop an understanding and action plan to advance transboundary co-operation and relationships, using the venue of Peace Parks, starting with WGIPP.

 

Our mission, if we decide to accept it, is to join us in helping others:

 

- build their Peace Park and Rotary information and knowledge,

- build social intelligence and contacts (networks; collaborations),

- build purposeful action,

- accelerate the transformation to a Culture of Peace and Non-violence.

 

In the process, we will learn by doing.  That is the essence of peace education, servant leadership and service above self.

 

The decision of Rotarians and Clubs, within our District and around the world, to act along with us may be motivated, among other things, by:

 

- a desire become better people – to become what we are capable of becoming (“we can do better”)

- to build personal peace, family peace, community peace, regional peace and world peace

- a conscience that no longer allows us to sit idly by while others suffer needlessly

- wanting to do something

·         to not be a victim of direct or indirect violence for ourself, our family, our community, our country,

·         building our own social intelligence and contacts (networks),

·         to live on purpose (as in ‘meaning of life’; “I can do better”)

·         exercising our own power (self-empowerment; self-reflection)

·         desire to be part of something bigger than just oneself, and succeed in the process

 

 

It takes commitment to get “off our duffs” and act.  Our target audiences are:

 

·         those that seek peace, violence prevention and building a better world for future generations (it makes sense that peace educators/leaders/builders need the most peace education and social intelligence),

·         community leaders (in Rotary Clubs, government, business, education, media, religion, etc.) that have a sworn duty to build a better community,

·         those that will readily embrace the values of Rotary’s Peace Park Initiative,

·         everyone else in due course (the Initiative is inclusive).

 

Those that will readily embrace the benefits of the Peace Parks and Rotary Initiative will be quick to join.  Some may not join in until they have a direct experience with violence, or until we have reached a ‘tipping point’ where it becomes fashionable to join in (eg. when recognizable leaders are talking about it).  Others may never join in – they will be the biggest losers, by not sharing the benefits of our work.

 

We will be developing a “Tool Kit” to help prospective Members.  In the meantime, a wealth of information is available on the Internet.  (As Carl Rogers said, “The only learning which significantly influences behaviour is self-directed, self-appropriated learning.”)

 

To keep people involved, we will have the Rotary community that will keep them interested and supported (i.e. local Rotary Clubs that serve as a magnet, positive reinforcement and support structure) – a Socially Intelligent Network. 

 

 

 

 

‘Branding’ the Peace Parks Initiative: A Highly Strategic Initiative

 

 

 

The Peace Parks and Rotary Marketing Strategy needs to go a step further – “Branding the Peace Parks Initiative”.  Branding means more than advertising – it is much larger, deeper and more encompassing in scope.  Effectively establishing, positioning and promoting the Peace Parks brand would contribute to achieving all of the objectives identified in the Peace Parks mission, vision and action plans.  In particular, it would help communicate the core values of Peace Parks and strengthen our identity, inside and outside the Initiative.  It will also help enhance our influence by creating a consistent, integrated and powerful picture of the Initiative and the value it delivers to the public.  Finally, a strong Peace Parks brand would provide a solid and coherent basis for promotional efforts to Members, youth, government, other institutions, the public and other key stakeholders.

 

Through the branding initiative, our goal is to achieve instant recognition for our Peace Parks brand – recognition for what the brand stands for; for what it means to be a Peace Park Professional; for what you get when you engage a Peace Park Professional; for the type of person a Peace Park Professional is and the values he or she adheres to; and for the attributes and personality traits you can generally expect to find in a Peace Park Professional.  The Peace Park brand should encompass and convey all this to the stakeholders significant to building a Culture of Peace and to its Members, in whatever context they work.  Together, Peace Park Professionals must live the brand and deliver the promise for it to be effective.

 

The branding exercise for Peace Parks must address the following questions:

 

·         what does the Peace Park brand stand for?

·         what is the “DNA” of the Peace Park brand identity?

·         what characterizes Peace Park Members as a group and a profession, and what do they want to become? That is, how do we as Peace Park Professionals want to be perceived and what do we want our designation to tell and promise the world, especially our key stakeholders and prospective members?

 

This is the essence of the brand and it must be relevant and inspirational. It needs to be explained, communicated and nurtured. And, eventually, it needs to be enhanced or changed to represent what Peace Park Professionals are today and what they will become tomorrow.

 

To do this, all Peace Park Members will have to seize every opportunity to share the meaning of the brand and build the brand and its culture. The meaning of the brand must be unifying — it is a rallying point, used to build consensus. The meaning and essence of a brand builds synergy and precedes any presentation of a visual solution. It becomes integrated in the culture of the profession and constitutes a source of motivation for members.

 

A brand is a dynamic concept. At its heart is a vision, with goals and a strong belief in its meaning and essence. A brand also carries values and is characterized by a set of attributes and an underlying personality. For key stakeholders, the Peace Park brand is a promise and a value proposition. On the surface, it has an identity that everyone can recognize (e.g. a logo, such as the mountaintop), but underneath its strength stems from a core culture that supports the brand. In our case, this is the members’ connection to the brand and their daily contribution to it through their work, practice, teaching and community involvement.

 

The brand strategy will be the central unifying thrust and idea around which decisions, actions and communications are aligned in a long-term perspective to strengthen and promote the Peace Park brand.  Brand strategy should be built on:

 

·         the strategic vision, mission and plan just developed

·         the profession’s history, culture, membership and organization

·         an in-depth understanding of key stakeholders’ needs and perceptions. Brand strategy should define positioning; essential promise; unique value proposition; differentiation; and competitive advantage.

 

Brand strategy should impact and influence members; students; business; government; the general public; and institutions and staff.  The imperatives of such a strategy are the following:

 

·         seize every opportunity to position the Peace Park Profession, uniquely and strongly, in the mind of Members, stakeholders and students;

·         consistently repeat a strong message and idea, over the long term;

·         communicate and demonstrate a unique competitive advantage;

·         understand stakeholders, their perceptions and expectations;

·         use all touch points in a coherent and convergent way;

·         yield emotions to build aspirations, admiration and loyalty to the brand.

 

The success factors that the Peace Park brand will have to meet to increase its value and strength are:

 

·         roots and authenticity: it must not be just a shiny image;

·         substantiation: as a profession we must be able to explain and prove our claims and statements;

·         credibility: the brand’s promise and value proposition must be credible;

·         sustainability: as a profession we must be able to deliver on the brand promises;

·         differentiation: the Peace Park brand must distinguish itself from other philosophies;

·         inner coherence: the Peace Park brand must have more than just surface consistency.

 

With this background, it is proposed that the Waterton-Glacier International/Peace Parks and Rotary brand be ‘unveiled’ as follows:

 

PEACE IS IN OUR NATURE:

THE NATURE OF PEACE AND

LEARNING FROM THE PEACE OF NATURE

 

It is believed that these words succinctly and clearly capture the essence of the purpose of the Peace Parks and Rotary Initiative. Rotary and Rotarians, by their nature and Fourth Object, work to change behaviors, forge values and incite institutional transformations from the current culture of war and violence to a Culture of Peace and Non-violence.

 

As individuals and society, we have a lot to learn from nature, and we have an obligation to protect nature.  The peace and harmony of nature is readily understandable, acceptable and supportable by most Rotarians and others (although we will still have to define, explain and raise awareness; refer to additional readings in Appendix 5 below).  Nature does not carry the ‘baggage’ often associated with ‘peace’.  Nevertheless, Nature is at the heart of building peace, preventing violence and creating a better world for future generations.  Nature can be our peace metaphor.

 

We have an opportunity to expand Peace Parks, their potential and beneficial nature.  Embracing Peace in the context of Nature as our Peace Parks brand will help us be mindful to walk the talk, and gain recruits, resources and results in the process.

 

 

Consistent with nature, this is a living, breathing, evolving, organic document.  Feedback is invited to stewartr [at] peace.ca

 

 

 

APPENDIX 1. BACKGROUND - PEACE, PARKS AND ROTARY

 

Prepared for the September, 2004 WGIPPA

 

I have done a bit of research on Peace Parks, and have put together the notes below.  My plan for our workshop is to try to maximize discussion by the participants (rather than a presentation or "lecture" type format).  I will take notes so that we have an Output Document with whatever conclusions, suggestions, etc. we come up with. 

 

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

 

Regards,

Bob Stewart

Rotary Club of Okotoks , Alberta , Canada (D5360)


 

Introduction

 

A special session on Rotary Peace Programs will be conducted: Theme - "How can an International Peace Park promote and stimulate International Peace".  To be held on Saturday morning - 1 1/2 to 2 hours.  Our technical peace program is planned as a discussion, co-learning and action planning event.  We will include in our discussion our activities for the formation, etc. of "Rotary International Peace Parks", which is a specific separate and readily identifiable niche of Rotary's commitment to peace.  The discussion may include an International Rotary Peace Park Fellowship,  possibly a "Rotary Peace Park Institute", peace through tourism, etc.  Information will be provided, including a copy of  Rotary's Seven Paths to Peace .  The discussion will be led by Rotarian Bob Stewart (Okotoks), PHF , C.A. , C.M.C., Director of Canadian Centres for Teaching Peace http://www.peace.ca

 

 


From the Rotary District 5390 Conference Website at http://www.rotarydistrict5390.org/ppevent.htm  :


In 1932, Glacier National Park and its northern sister park, Waterton Lakes National Park became the world’s first International Peace Park . Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park celebrates the longest unguarded boundary on Earth: The 5,000-mile boundary between the United States and Canada .


In the 70 years since, people have created 138 international peace parks, friendship parks and similar transboundary protected areas on five continents. Some of these have been in the most embattled corners of the globe.

Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park was the brainchild of Rotary Club International, led by a cluster of Rotary Clubs in Montana . and Alberta .    In the early 1930s, the scars of World War I were still fresh, much of the world was gripped in economic crisis and the first hints of World War II were beginning to emerge.  Organizers saw the creation of Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park as a way to cement harmonious relations between old allies, while providing a model for peace for nations around the world.

 

The seven decades since 1932 brought times of war and peace, prosperity and poverty around the world. But through it all the idea of the international peace park proved a powerful symbol for mankind’s capacity for friendship.  ...


Shortly after the terrorist strikes of Sept. 11, 2001 , South African leader Nelson Mandela spoke at an elephant reintroduction ceremony at the new Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park , which includes portions of South Africa , Mozambique and Zimbabwe :

“In the wake of the terrible shock with which the entire world learnt of the acts of terrorism in the United States , we faced and continue to face the prospects of conflict on a world-wide scale . . . .  In a world beset by conflict and division, peace is one of the cornerstones of the future.  Peace parks are a building block in this process, not only in our region, but potentially in the entire world.”

 

A Message from Our President:  from http://www.rotary5360.org/archive/2003_Peace_Park.htm


"Never in the history of mankind has rebellion, riot and terrorism over state, religion and race prevailed throughout so many areas of the world. Never has the Rotary International tenet of PEACE become more precious and significant. As Rotarians we embrace all religions, creeds and colors; favoring freedom, truth and justice for all.

 

The search for International Peace must be our foremost goal. We can and we must make a difference.

 

The concept of an International Peace Park was conceived by Cardston Rotary Club President Lowe in 1930. On July 4, 1931 Rotarians from Alberta and Montana , at a Goodwill meeting in Waterton, adopted the concept and petitioned their respective governments. The Canadian Parliament and U.S. Congress simultaneously passed legislation recognizing the Peace Park and dedication took place at the first assembly in Glacier Park on June 19, 1932 .

 

Subsequent assemblies have been held annually and alternate between Waterton and Glacier Parks . Assemblies are celebrations of Fellowship, Friendship, Goodwill and Peace which has existed between our two countries for almost 200 years. Each assembly culminates with an inspirational “Hands Across the Border Ceremony”.

 

I would like to quote an excerpt from our “ Peace Park ” display.

 

The future of Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park has yet to be written. It will always remain as a symbol of Peace and Friendship between the United States and Canada , and of the benefits of the cooperative management between the two park systems. But can it be more? Can it also expand to symbolize world peace as well? What better setting exists for world leaders to gather, to resolve International disputes, to bring together warring factions, and to create world peace. The final outcome of that July 4, 1931 Rotary Meeting may be greater than ever imagined. Can Rotarians create International Peace Parks throughout the world? Can all Rotary International Peace Parks affiliate to form “ONE” International Peace Park Assembly? I have a dream - a time when delegates from Rotary Peace Parks throughout the world will meet at Waterton- Glacier to celebrate Peace and Goodwill in a “Hands Across All Borders Ceremony”.


 

PEACE"

 

Submitted by Mike Demaniuk , President (2002 - 2004)


 

Background:

 

Protected areas are vital for life on earth.  A shared vision of transboundary co-operation by all is the ultimate goal.

Across the globe, armed conflicts over disputed borders abound, such as between Israel and Palestine , and between India and Pakistan . At the same time something called "peace parks" are popping up along hotly contested borders where landmines and rocket launchers are the norm, not the peace and quiet of the natural world.

 

While many peace parks are proposed to help restore war-ravaged environments, others are designed to honor and preserve peaceful, pristine areas as a contrast to the nearby conflicts. The National Park's Conservation Association's Steve Thompson, the U.S. 's foremost peace parks expert (contacts below), says they are part of a viable solution to some of the world’s greatest conflicts.


One example is the Red Sea Marine Peace Park . It was created as part of the 1994 peace treaty between Israel and Jordan , which specifies joint protection of the coral reefs which border both countries.

 

As early as 1932, the Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park was designated to commemorate the long history of peace and friendship between Canada and the United States , and to emphasize both natural and cultural links.

 

And in 1998, Peru and Ecuador established the Cordillera del Condor Peace Transborder Reserve. The countries had fought over placement of their border for years. Now they jointly manage the park, which straddles the once disputed line and remains riddled with landmines, one of the lingering effects of warfare.

 

The Peace Parks Foundation is dedicated to creating transnational parks in Southern Africa .

 

Because the first peace parks were so successful, environmentalists and peace experts are proposing more such parks across the globe. On the forefront of this effort are the husband and wife team of Nigel and Antonia Young. He is a peace studies professor at Colgate University and she is an independent anthropologist specializing in the former Yugoslavia . It was through their combined interests that they first came up with the idea of a peace park (about half the size of Maryland ) on the borders of Kosovo , Montenegro and Albania .

 

SIACHEN PEACE PARK GAINING MOMENTUM - The Siachen glacier between India and Pakistan is the longest mountain glacier in the world - and the world's highest battlefield. Since 20 years, the armed forces of India and Pakistan have fought on the Saltaro Ridge, south of the Siachen Glacier, with at least 15,000 casualties - mainly from altitude and weather - and devastating the unique glacier environment.  Turning the entire area into a Transboundary Peace Park may help resolving this conflict. This park would enable both parties to withdraw under conditions of honour and dignity; it would save thousands of lives and billions of rupees; and it would stop further degradation of a magnificent mountain area. Transboundary Peace Parks aim to foster cooperation and peace between countries and to conserve ecosystems which do not recognize national borders. The number of Transboundary Protected Areas, more than 169 today, has doubled since 1990. An informal group of the World Commission on Protected Areas, together with a range of international organisations, is promoting the Siachen Peace Park . This includes an active group in the USA , based at the University of Vermont . IUCN - The World Conservation Union joined with the mountaineering group of the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation (UIAA) in 2002 to sponsor a series of summit climbs in Switzerland as symbolic Peace Climbs involving Indian and Pakistani mountaineers. Under the Italian "K2 2004 - 50 years later" project, the idea of the Siachen Peace Park was presented at the Vth IUCN World Parks Congress, with representatives from Indian and Pakistani non-governmental organisations amongst the audience. At this year's International Environmental Security conference in The Hague , international organizations expressed their will to help in funding and supporting the Siachen Peace Park . For September this year, a workshop "Save the Siachen: an Environmental Initiative" is planned after the meeting of the Foreign Ministers of India and Pakistan , with some 80 diplomats, celebrities and researchers expected to attend. However, the success of all activities is dependent on the military negotiations first, that are only recovering slowly after the major crisis caused by terrorist attacks in 2001 and 2002.



Even the most avid supporters of peace parks admit that they aren't the solution to all the world's troubles. But peace parks expert Steve Thompson says they could be a small piece of the bigger solution. He says peace parks are more than expressions of goodwill between nations -- they are actively being used as a tool to resolve conflict and ensure conservation because they require the countries involved to agree to set aside and jointly manage the new reserve. In the last 10 years, about a dozen peace parks have been established expressly to resolve conflict, enabling the previously warring nations to cooperate in managing the territory, says Thompson.

 


Global Partnership for Peace Parks: http://www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/theme/parks/parks.html 

 

In recent years, due to increasing interest in this concept, it has become evident that a Global Partnership for Peace Parks is required to promote the concept and practice of Peace Parks world-wide.  This Global Partnership will build on the experience and work on this issue by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources), the Peace Parks Foundation, WWF-International and the University for Peace. These three institutions are playing a leading role on the promotion and implementation of TBPAs and Peace Parks . However there is so much to be done on the interpretation, promotion, and application of this concept that it would be difficult for institutions working in isolation to succeed.


 

The objectives of this initiative are:

-          To catalyse the creation of new Peace Parks and to strengthen existing ones in a number of regions, giving priority to areas declared by UNESCO as World Heritage sites.

-          To empower, through capacity building, local communities and indigenous peoples organizations to actively participate in the development and implementation of Peace Parks initiatives

-          To develop, adopt, test and disseminate Best Practice Guidelines and a Code of Conduct on TBPAs to facilitate their wider acceptance and application.

-          To facilitate the exchange of data and information, provide outside expertise, capacity building as well as legal and technical assistance for planning and implementing the Peace Park concept, through development of the TBPA Resource Centre.

-          To develop a Peace Parks Council to promote recognition and application of the Peace Park concept, including creation of a UN International Award for Peace Parks.

-          A project proposal to support this initiative has been prepared for submission to the UN Foundation. This project is the result of a process of consultation with all partners involved on this initiative at global and regional levels. If this project is granted a programme of work will be developed for the next three years.

 


Definitions:

 

Protected Area - An area of land and/or sea especially dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of natural and associated cultural resources, and managed through legal or other effective means (IUCN, 1994a).

 

Transboundary Protected Area (TBPA) - An area of land and/or sea that straddles one or more boundaries between states, sub-national units such as provinces and regions, autonomous areas and/or areas beyond the limits of national sovereignty or jurisdiction, whose constituent parts are especially dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of natural and associated cultural resources, and managed co-operatively through legal or other effective means.

Parks for Peace - Parks for Peace are transboundary protected areas that are formally dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of natural and associated cultural resources, and to the promotion of peace and co-operation.


 

 

Objectives for Parks for Peace (from Transboundary protected areas for peace and co-operation , reference below)


The identification/designation of Parks for Peace by the cooperating jurisdictions should include only those areas where the agreed management objectives explicitly recognise both a protected area purpose and a peace purpose.


Parks for Peace should be founded on the recognition that human security, good governance, equitable development and respect for human rights are interdependent and indivisible. Peace is best developed by addressing the root causes of conflict and by promoting sustainable development, the rule of law and adherence to human rights, whether civil, political, economic, social or cultural.


Specific objectives of Parks for Peace may include the following aspects:


(i) Supporting long-term co-operative conservation of biodiversity, ecosystem services, and natural and cultural values across boundaries;


(ii) Promoting landscape-level ecosystem management through integrated bio-regional land-use planning and management;


(iii) Building trust, understanding, reconciliation and co-operation between and among countries, communities, agencies and other stakeholders;


(iv) Preventing and/or resolving tension, including over access to natural resources;


(v) Promoting the resolution of armed conflict and/or reconciliation following armed conflict;


(vi) Sharing biodiversity and cultural resource management skills and experience, including co-operative research and information management;


(vii) Promoting more efficient and effective co-operative management programmes;


(viii)Promoting access to, and equitable and sustainable use of natural resources, consistent with national sovereignty; and


(ix) Enhancing the benefits of conservation and promoting benefit-sharing across boundaries among stakeholders.

 
Good Practice Guidelines:


The IUCN/Cardiff series of Protected Area Management Guidelines are designed to help protected area managers, government officials, policy-makers, NGOs, community leaders, donors, etc.  Like all the guidelines in the series, these guidelines on TBPAs are not rules, but advice.  The guidance is set out under nine headings:


1. Identifying and promoting common values

2. Involving and benefiting local people

3. Obtaining and maintaining support of decision-makers

4. Promoting coordinated and co-operative activities

5. Achieving coordinated planning and protected area development

6. Developing co-operative agreements

7. Working towards funding sustainability

8. Monitoring and assessing progress

9. Dealing with tension or armed conflict



Role of "Third Parties":


The Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park , in the Rocky Mountains of Canada and USA , was established in 1932 at the initiative of an NGO, Rotary International. In Central Africa, field co-operation among the three respective nature conservation agencies of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Uganda in the Mgahinga Gorilla/Virunga/Volcanoes National Park, has been encouraged and supported by three NGOs (African Wildlife Foundation, Fauna and Flora International, and WWF). The private Peace Parks Foundation in South Africa is currently supporting several trans-boundary conservation areas among the SADC states.

 
Encouragement may come from donors who, through their grants, loans and technical assistance, support transboundary co-operation and thus give impetus to national governments to enter into agreements involving transboundary co-operation in protected areas. For example, in the case of the Meso American Biological Corridor, GEF, GTZ and the European Union are supporting transboundary co-operation among 37 protected areas in eight countries.


Though the main motive for donors to act in this way has so far been better conservation, it could also be a means to promote regional co-operation during times of tension. Donor support for this purpose is being provided for the cloudforests in Africa ’s Albertine Rift by IUCN Netherlands. Some donors have looked at how they might support a whole programme of transboundary conservation areas in a region; for example, USAID has been examining how it could assist transboundary conservation programmes in the SADC region.

 

References:

 

Steve Thompson: Glacier Field Representative Northern Rockies Regional Office (mailto: sthompson@npca.org ) National Parks Conservation Association, PO Box 4485 , 144 E. Second St. , Whitefish , MT 59937


Transboundary protected areas for peace and co-operation, based on the proceedings of workshops held in Bormio (1998) and Gland (2000) / Sandwith, Trevor ; Shine, Clare ; Hamilton, Lawrence S. ; Sheppard, David. - IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas ; University of Cardiff , Department of City and Regional Planning - 2001.   http://iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/PAG-007.pdf  5 Star Must Reading

 

Peace Parks Foundation http://www.peaceparks.org ( South Africa )


The International Institute for Peace through Tourism (IIPT) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to fostering and facilitating tourism initiatives which contribute to international understanding and cooperation, an improved quality of environment, the preservation of heritage, and through these initiatives, help to bring about a peaceful and sustainable world.  For more information, web site: http://www.iipt.org  .  A major step forward towards the vision of "Tourism as a Global Peace Industry" was taken at the Global Summit on Peace through Tourism with the formation of a Coalition of Partners for World Peace through Tourism.  Formation of the Coalition was a demonstration of support by the world's largest industry for the United Nations International Year for the Culture of Peace (2000) and in continuing support for the United Nations International Decade for a Culture of Peace and Non-Violence for the Children of the World (2001-2010).  Each founding partner is committed to a Millennium Project that contributes to a "Culture of Peace through Tourism" as reflected in the Amman Declaration. International organizations interested in joining this global initiative are invited to contact the International Institute for Peace through Tourism (IIPT), Email: Coalition@iipt.org  .  The Global Peace Parks Project builds on the success of IIPT’s Peace Parks Across Canada Project commemorating Canada ’s 125th birthday as a nation in 1992.  In that year, 400 cities and towns from St. John’s Newfoundland on the shores of the Atlantic Ocean, across 5 time zones to Victoria, British Columbia, on the shores of the Pacific, dedicated a park to peace, each park with a Peace Grove (Bosco Sacro) of 12 trees as a symbolic link to one another and a symbol of hope for the future.  The parks were dedicated 12:00 noon local time as a national Peace Keeping Monument was unveiled in Ottawa , the nation’s capital, honoring U.N. Peace Keepers of all nations. 


Peace Through Tourism course, Transcend Peace University

http://www.transcend.org/tpu/courses.shtml?x=94  – tourism being the world's biggest industry could be a giant peacebuilding activity - how can tourism serve peace?


Report on Human Security and Environment

 http://www.iucn.org/pareport/frsp/pareport/human_peace.htm

 

International Holistic Tourism Education Centre (IHTEC) is dedicated to developing Global Sustainability Education programs that educate young people through "Tourism as a Vital Force for Peace".  http://www.ihtec.org

 


APPENDIX 2. DRAFTING A PROTOCOL TO GUIDE OUR CONVERSATIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS

One of the key tasks of Rotarians is to draft a protocol to guide our conversations, relationships and how we approach diverse stakeholder groups.  It is simply how we relate to each other while trying to build a Culture of Peace, and safeguard (secure; or at least improve) all of our relationships. 

First, it is important to acknowledge that we expect that everyone who participates in the Peace Parks and Rotary Initiative will pledge to live by Rotary’s ‘Four Way Test’ principles, in Appendix 3 below.

We (all) probably need a preamble to everything we say and do to try to diffuse our conversations (to minimize potential conflict).  Peace is of such ultimate importance that we have to take whatever safeguards we can not to jeopardize our most important work, and not to take things personally.  Whatever we do, we will have to ask participants to bear with us … and join us in a mutual learning conversation.  We must acknowledge imperfection in ourselves and others, and that we must continuously learn. 

We do not wish to offend and will also have to try to be mindful of “hot buttons” and speak in different languages to different audiences.  Some of us must get past old “we vs. they” images.  But as much as we will try, some people may be offended by what we say and they may divorce themselves from our conversation (I would suggest to our mutual detriment, and we hope to avoid this). 

Such a preamble may get tiresome (and may sound a bit overly cautious), but unfortunately there is a tendency to take some offence at a word, an action, a person, etc., and we know that we must always remind ourselves to rethink what we really want to achieve (in this relationship and life).

Until we develop our own “protocol” or strategy for approaching others, it is recommended for our own ‘internal security’ as a Culture of Peace community that we use the tools and methods contained in the following important texts - Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most; Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High; Crucial Confrontations: Tools for Resolving Broken Promises, Violated Expectations and Bad Behavior; and The Practice of Peace, summarized in Appendix 4 below.  We recommend that anyone participating in the Peace Parks and Rotary Initiative read these books.

Possibly we can develop a short list of  “Principles for Rotary Conversations”.  Considering the recommendations from the books in Appendix 4 below which explain and expand on these Principles, I came up with the following suggestions:

  1. Safety – guard the space against direct or indirectly violent behaviour (eg. Lack of respect, rejection, insult, etc.; there are no stupid questions or answers; we are all continuously learning; recognize that we live in an imperfect world and we are all trying to do our best to build a better one, for the sake of future generations; stop and think first, to select your words with care, compassion and empathy)
  2. Consequences – honest conversations are foiled if participants fear negative consequences; participants should mean no harm, have no fear, and have a clear understanding of the ‘rules’; trust must be built and earned; go to mutual purpose
  3. Acceptance – of the others as people, and respect for them and their opinions (dispel enemy images; listen to understand why they have the opinions they do)
  4. Mutual purpose – what is the outcome that we wish to achieve together? (invitation to a mutual learning conversation; answer ‘what is in it for us’; particularly being mindful of the overall Culture of Peace purpose/values; we aim for synergy and transformation)
  5. Patience - one of the essential characteristics of a Culture of Peace is 'patience'. Impatience almost always leads to a culture of violence, whereas a continued practice of patience is guaranteed to develop a Culture of Peace.
  6. Difference – we are not required to achieve consensus (it is OK to agree to disagree; we can learn from our differences, in fact we do not learn if we always agree)
  7. Empowerment – help the others to be courageous and find their voices so that we better understand their perspectives; we want them to honestly tell us what is bothering them, what their story is, what they wish to achieve, how we can help them and how they can help us
  8. Action – what are we going to do to continue to build a better relationship
  9. Responsibility – people are responsible for their own experiences (the success for any participant of any conversation depends to the greatest extent on the participant’s attitude; don’t blame others; don’t try to control others – you really can’t)

Frankly, we know it will take some years of continuous learning for us to master crucial conversations – like peace, it is hard work!  In the meantime, we appreciate your patience. 

APPENDIX 3. ROTARY’S MISSION (OBJECT) AND THE FOUR WAY TEST

We take guidance from the following Rotary principles:

Object of Rotary

The Object of Rotary is to encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise and, in particular, to encourage and foster:

FIRST. The development of acquaintance as an opportunity for service;

SECOND. High ethical standards in business and professions, the recognition of the worthiness of all useful occupations, and the dignifying of each Rotarian's occupation as an opportunity to serve society;

THIRD. The application of the ideal of service in each Rotarian's personal, business, and community life;

FOURTH. The advancement of international understanding, goodwill, and peace through a world fellowship of business and professional persons united in the ideal of service.

(from http://www.rotary.org/aboutrotary/object.html )

 

Rotary’s Four Way Test 

It is expected that participants of the Peace Parks and Rotary initiative would join the pledge to follow the four key points of The Four-Way Test:

From the earliest days of the organization, Rotarians were concerned with promoting high ethical standards in their professional lives. One of the world's most widely printed and quoted statements of business ethics is The Four-Way Test, which was created in 1932 by Rotarian Herbert J. Taylor (who later served as RI president) when he was asked to take charge of a company that was facing bankruptcy.

This 24-word test for employees to follow in their business and professional lives became the guide for sales, production, advertising, and all relations with dealers and customers, and the survival of the company is credited to this simple philosophy. Adopted by Rotary in 1943, The Four-Way Test has been translated into more than a hundred languages and published in thousands of ways. It asks the following four questions:

"Of the things we think, say or do:

  1. Is it the TRUTH?
  2. Is it FAIR to all concerned?
  3. Will it build GOODWILL and BETTER FRIENDSHIPS?
  4. Will it be BENEFICIAL to all concerned?"

 

(from http://www.rotary.org/aboutrotary/4way.html )

 


APPENDIX 4. HOW TO DISCUSS WHAT MATTERS MOST WITH DIVERSE GROUPS

1. "Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most", by the Harvard Negotiation Project.  ISBN 0 14 02.8852 X.  Penguin 1999. You can buy the book for $11.20 at http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/014028852X/002-6059897-9091241?v=glance  .

Introduction
- "Returning from several years in the U.S. Army Air Force during World War II, I discovered that my roommate, two of my closest friends, and dozens of classmates had been killed in the war.  Ever since, I have worked to improve the skills with which we deal with our differences; to improve the prospects for our children's future; and to enlist others in that cause." 
- "What makes these situations so hard to face?  It's our fear of the consequences -- whether we raise the issue or try to avoid it." 
- "The dilemma ... Why is it so difficult to decide whether to avoid or to confront?  Because at some level we know the truth - If we try to avoid the problem, we'll feel taken advantage of, our feelings will fester, we'll wonder why we don't stick up for ourselves, and we'll rob the other person of the opportunity to improve things.  But if we confront the problem, things might get even worse.  We may be rejected or attacked; we might hurt the other person in ways we didn't intend; and the relationship might suffer." 
- "Delivering a difficult message is like throwing a hand grenade.  Coated with sugar, thrown hard or soft, a hand grenade is still going to do damage. Try as you may, there's no way to throw a hand grenade with tact or to outrun its consequences.  And keeping it to yourself is no better.  Choosing not to deliver a difficult message is like hanging on to a hand grenade once you've pulled the pin.  So we feel stuck.  We need advice that is more powerful than "Be diplomatic" or "Try to stay positive".  The problems run deeper than that; so must the answers." 
- "... learning conversations ... people who have learned new approaches to dealing with their most challenging conversations report less anxiety and greater effectiveness in all of their conversations ... dealing constructively with tough topics and awkward situations strengthens a relationship." 
- "At heart, the problem isn't in your actions, it's in your thinking."
- Reducing fear and anxiety and learning how to manage that which remains are more obtainable … we are also remarkably resilient 

Create a Learning Conversation
To increase our chances of achieving a successful conversation we must have a good strategy.  Here are some general tips from the above book:
1. having a purpose (what is the point and what does a good outcome look like?; three purposes that work: learning their story, expressing your views and feelings, and problem-solving together)
2. remember that we can not change or control other people (we can have influence, and engaging someone in a conversation where mutual learning is the goal often results in change)
3. letting go of past issues (grievances, losses) and working together from a basis of current commonalities, strengths and assets to build a better future
4. engaging in nonviolent communication (eg. do not "poke the other person in the eye" ;-); otherwise they get defensive and/or offensive (and blind to us ;-) (for information on compassionate communication, refer to http://www.bcncc.org/  )
5. realizing all parties to the conversation are not perfect (we all see the world differently, we all have powerful feelings, and we each have our own identity issues to work through; in short, we each have our own story, and our own picture of peace)
6. think like a mediator (identify the Third Side, or Third Story; the key is learning to describe the gap or difference between our stories, then working to try to close it, which may take movement by all parties)
7. turn it into a learning conversation: describe the problem in a way both sides can accept, propose mutual understanding and problem-solving as purposes, check with others to see if this makes sense, and invite others to join the conversation (make them your partner in figuring it out; those that do not wish to participate can opt-out).  Provide some relevant background reading that might help open minds.
8. listen to understand; ask open-ended questions; ask for more information; respect others; create a safe environment for dialogue
9. think and strategize before you speak; don't cross-examine; don't blame; don't take away from the other person; paraphrase for clarity, to show that you heard, and check your understanding; acknowledge their feelings; empathize; speak from the heart, start with what matters most and say what you mean; don't exaggerate, generalize or stereotype; be humble (having humility does not mean allowing others to "walk all over you")
10. It is up to each of us to find our own truth (i.e. my truth is not necessarily your truth; you should not simply accept what I say: you have to do your own "homework")
11. identify the issues and problems from all perspectives; make the "trouble" explicit; find out where there is agreement and disagreement, and why; then begin to problem-solve: brainstorm with all affected parties, invent options, ask what standards should apply, consider alternatives
12. have patience: it takes time
13. rehearse the conversation in your mind before starting (have preparation notes; think things through)
14. appreciate the diversity of thoughts and ideas
15. sometimes we have to agree to disagree, with all due respect
16. thank the parties for their participation (it will take a lot of effort, and hopefully it is worthwhile)
I look forward to your thoughts and additional suggestions on this.  I am most interested because peacebuilders and peace educators are always having a difficult conversation.  I am hopeful that we can develop a model for peacebuilding to help us work through the various difficult conversations that must take place.
 Click here to see an excellent 19 page summary of the book.  5 Star Must Reading.

2. Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High, by Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan and Al Switzler.  Format: Paperback, 256pp. ISBN: 0071401946. Publisher: McGraw-Hill Trade. Pub. Date: June 2002. Retail price US$16.95. If you liked the book "Difficult Converations", you will love "Crucial Conversations".  5-Star Recommended/Must Reading .  A powerful, seven-step approach to handling difficult conversations with confidence and skill.  

Introduction
- Relationships are the priority of life, and conversations are the crucial element in profound caring of relationships.
- "Crucial" conversations are interpersonal exchanges at work or at home that we dread having but know we cannot avoid. How do you say what needs to be said while avoiding an argument with a boss, child, or relationship partner? Crucial Conversations offers readers a proven seven-point strategy for achieving their goals in all those emotionally, psychologically, or legally charged situations that can arise in their professional and personal lives. Based on the authors' highly popular DialogueSmart training seminars, the techniques are geared toward getting people to lower their defenses, creating mutual respect and understanding, increasing emotional safety, and encouraging freedom of expression. Among other things, readers also learn about the four main factors that characterize crucial conversations, and they get a powerful six-minute mastery technique that prepares them to work through any high impact situation with confidence. Learn how to keep your cool and get what you want when emotions flare. When stakes are high, opinions vary, and emotions run strong, you have three choices: Avoid a crucial conversation and suffer the consequences; handle the conversation badly and suffer the consequences; or read Crucial Conversations and discover how to communicate best when it matters most. This wise and witty guide gives you the tools you need to step up to life's most difficult and important conversations, say what's on your mind, and achieve positive outcomes that will amaze you. You'll learn how to:

Whether they take place at work or at home, with your neighbors or your spouse, crucial conversations can have a profound impact on your career, your happiness, and your future. With the skills you learn in this book, you'll never have to worry about the outcome of a crucial conversation again.  Read Chapter 1 at http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadershop/0194-6excerpt.html  

Foreword
- charged atmosphere … nourish our relationships and develop tools, skills, and enhanced capacity to find new and better solutions
- synergistic … the whole is greater than the sum of the parts
- crucial conversations transform people and relationships … an entirely new level of bonding
- they produce what Buddhism calls “the middle way” … a higher middle way, like the apex of a triangle
- it moves you from understanding the supernal power of dialogue, to clarifying what you really want to have happen and focusing on what actually is happening, to creating conditions of safety, to using self-awareness and self-knowledge … how to achieve such a level of mutual understanding and creative synergy that people are emotionally connected to the conclusions
- to know and not to do is really not to know

Click here to see an excellent 20 page summary of the book online. 5 star must read.

3. Crucial Confrontations: Tools for Resolving Broken Promises, Violated Expectations, and Bad Behavior,  by Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan and Al Switzler.  Format: Paperback, 272pp. ISBN: 0-07-144652-4. Publisher: McGraw-Hill Trade. Pub. Date: January 2005. Retail price US$16.95.  This 5-Star Recommended/Must Reading builds on Difficult Conversations and Crucial Conversations.  The difference - the hallmark of a crucial conversation is disagreement, while crucial confrontations are about disappointments.  Confrontations comprise the very foundation of accountability.  They all start with the question: "Why didn't you do what you were supposed to do?"  And they only end when a solution is reached and both parties are motivated and able to comply.  Confrontations are the prickly, complicated, and often frightening performance discussions that keep you up nights.  We will need these skills for conducting the 8 Crucial Canadian Conversations noted below Click here to see 2 page Training Overview.  here's the forward and 1st chapter in pdf.  

Click here to see an excellent 18 page summary of the book online. 5 star must read.


4.
Learning in Relationship: Foundation for Personal and Professional Success, by Ron Short, 1998. Learning in relationship is “about how to learn from others who have different perspectives”.    Click here to see an excellent 13 page summary of the book.  5 Star Must Reading.


5.
The Practice of Peace
by Harrison Owen.  I wish to tell you about this because I see another convergence between the comments that the peacebuilding happens during the process of working on projects (for example), and using the Open Space conferencing in the process.  Owen is the leader behind Open Space Technology.  Open Space Technology or methodology of conferencing is very complimentary to what we have come around to thinking in terms of Servant Leadership style, non-hierarchical organizing, and the principles contained in the draft Charter (borrowed from the World Social Forum).  I have come to believe (an "aha" moment) that essentially the Canadian Peace Initiative may be as simple as providing venues or "Open Spaces to Open Minds to Peace".  (Another "reality check" -- It has been my personal view that I saw my contribution as simply providing venues where peace educators and peace builders could come together to dialogue, network, disseminate information, plan, etc. - in a sense, I/we have been doing Open Space for the past 3 years + without realizing it, through our conferences, my web site, our email listservers, etc.)  What Harrison Owen is saying is, "do not worry about spending a lot of time organizing an agenda.  Just provide an Open Space, have a general theme(s), invite people with a passion to come, the conference will organize itself based on what these passionate people really want to discuss".  He confirms what I think many of our participants have said at the last National Peace Education Conference -- that our best time was in the personal chats outside the presentations.  Harrison puts it much better than I.  You can read (and I highly recommend it to you) the 146 page book on the Internet at  Practice of Peace, Chapters 1,2    Practice of Peace, Chapters 2,4    Practice of Peace, Chapters 5,6,    Practice of Peace, Chapters 7,8Practice of Peace, Chapters 9,10 .  (the only thing is, the Internet version is missing about 4 pages - but it doesn't really matter).  Alternatively, you can order your own copy from the Open Space Institute of Canada in Quebec , by printing an order form off the Internet at http://www.openspacecanada.org/books.htm  and mailing it with a cheque (but it may take 3 weeks to turn around).  Suggestion: do all your group work as a series of Open Space conferencing.  In Owen's words, it will be self-organizing (which coincidentally takes a lot of stress off you).  You may well think that I have gone a bit crazy with this Open Space stuff.  However, I feel it is right for us, for what we have been working on, for the peace constituents, and for these times.  Open Space has all the features of a Culture of Peace (eg. democratic participation, respect, listening to understand, etc.)    Click on this link to read Highlights of the Book.  http://www.peace.ca/openspace.htm    

6. APPLYING THE PEDAGOGY OF POSITIVENESS TO DIPLOMATIC COMMUNICATION

7. Cialdini, Robert B. - Influence: Science and Practice, Fourth Edition. Allyn & Bacon: 2001 - Chapter by chapter topic summary. This book outlines the categories, uses, tools, and techniques of 'influence' and how to recognize them. This book is a useful tool for understanding the science behind 'influence'. 


APPENDIX 5. THE PEACE AND NATURE CONNECTION – FURTHER READINGS

 

A quick Internet search turned up the following articles and quotes:

 

Peace Is A Natural State of Mind

 

http://www.buddhanet.net/lmed6.htm :

Peace is a natural mind-state in every one of us.

Peace is the essence of our own innate nature and can never be destroyed.

Peace is with us every single moment of our life, but we do not recognise it. This is because we are ignorant about peace - most of the time we are too preoccupied with the external world and our own running thoughts and emotions to be aware of it. We have lost touch with our inner selves, with what is the best in us. We frantically try to find the answer outside when all the time peace is sitting there, silently waiting until we come home to it.

 

http://www.sis.gov.eg/sharm/html/sharm02.htm :  The land of peace in Egypt

 

http://www.revision-notes.co.uk/revision/1009.html :

Kant concludes, that "In this way, nature guarantees perpetual peace by the actual mechanism of human inclinations."

http://www.constitution.org/kant/perpeace.htm

 

http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/bodhidharma/internetbuddha.html :

like the mind of God … It is now apparent that the omnipresent, instantaneously interactive electronic super-structure of the Internet, the World Wide Web, and the commercial information services-along with the mega-databanks, digital cellular/fiber-optic satellite-relayed telephone networks, plus TV, FM, AM and ham radio, citizens bands, and all other electro-etheric connections-collectively comprise the evolving nervous system of the planet, what author Peter Russell calls the Global Brain. Cyberspace is our emerging planetary super-consciousness. The multi-dimensional link-up we are undergoing amounts to nothing less than the next step in the evolution of human consciousness and the emerging world self-awareness.

This is cause for optimism and enthusiasm. We may soon be seeing the first moment in history when most people, most of the time realize their underlying unity with everyone else and the world, and begin to behave accordingly. To quote a June 1994 issue of Scientific American, "Computer networking offers the soundest basis for world peace that has yet been presented. Peace must be created on the bulwark of understanding. International computer networks will knit together the peoples of the world in bonds of mutual respect; its possibilities are vast, indeed."

 

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1175/is_4_34/ai_76577460  :

Nature's Path To Inner Peace - environmental psychology