MSVU,
Halifax NS
Faculty
of Education
GFDD
6657
Peace
and Social Justice: Pedagogy and Practice
January-April
2005
Dr.
Sue McGregor 457-6385
http://www.consultmcgregor.com
Course
Description and Objectives
Peace education assumes people are naturally inclined towards
living in peace and is about (a) teaching children and others how to be
peaceful, (b) teaching strategies to build a desire for peace (including a
respect for the role of conflict in daily life), (c) and how to build a
culture of peace, a culture of non-violence (resolve conflict constructively).
Peace education brings together multiple traditions of pedagogy, theories of
education, and international initiatives for the advancement of human
development through learning. Peace education has both a consciousness raising
component (one’s desire to live in peace) and a teaching component (how to
achieve peace) (Ian Harris, 2000).
Pedagogy is the act of imparting knowledge to someone and is
made up of two things: (a) what counts as knowledge and (b) what is the most
effective way to get this knowledge across to, or solicit it from, the
“learner.” Knowledge can come from: (1) personal/cultural as lived each
day, (2) popular culture, press and the media (mainstream and alternative),
(3) mainstream academics (Western research paradigm), (4) transformative
academics (this approach challenges the mainstream academic), or (5) school
knowledge found in books and curriculum guides. One’s pedagogical approach
is a key determinant of human relationships in the educational process. It is
the medium of communication between teacher and learner, and the aspect which most
affects what learners receive from their teachers and vice versa. Also,
some pedagogical approaches challenge, reveal or expose the status quo while
others reinforce, conceal or obscure the status quo, that being the current
context that perpetuates violence, oppression, exclusion, injustice, etc.
Peace pedagogy Peace education brings together multiple
traditions of pedagogy. Learners should leave the course with a closer
appreciation of their own professional understanding of a peace education
pedagogy. To that end, each learner will be expected to participate
fully in class seminars on each of the building blocks of the course and be
prepared to lead discussions and share comparative analyses. This engagement
with other learners and course material should lead to a deep understanding of
how various scholars and you understand what a peaceful classroom “looks
like.” The word look means more than just the outward appearances and
includes peace education processes and philosophy (values, attitudes, goals
and principles) that create that peaceful look you see when you peak into a
peaceful classroom. Source of this picture is http://www.jalmarpress.com/item22280.ctlg
Textbook
Harris,
I., & Morrison, M.L. (2003). Peace education (2nd ed.).
Jefferson, NC: McFarlane.
Web
articles are
integrated into the schedule below.
A
tentative schedule of topics follows
|
|
Unit Topic (10 classes) |
Seminar Topic |
Text |
Readings from the professor |
Readings from the Internet and other sources |
|
UNIT ONE - The Big Picture |
|||||
|
|
UNIT
ONE 1. Globalization and Neoliberalism |
|
|
Articles
# 3 & 4 at http://www.consultmcgregor.com
Plus some e-attachments on globalization from Professor. |
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/Intro&overview.pdf
UN 2001 Report on the World Social Situation. 19 pp
Entire report is 300 pages. There are sections on peace, violence and
justice. http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N03/534/71/PDF/N0353471.pdf?OpenElement
(2003 report is 90 pages) Robin Burns (2000) Globalization and peace ed at (11 pages) http://www.peace2.uit.no/hefp/contributions/papers/Burns_Robin_11E_1.pdf |
|
|
UNIT
ONE 2. Current State of the School System in the context of globalization and neoliberalism |
|
|
|
Apple
(1999) neoliberalism and education at 10 pages http://www.tc.columbia.edu/CICE/articles/ma112.pdf
See also http://www.tc.columbia.edu/CICE/articles/pwc112.htm
6 pages Privitization and educational equity (Cookson, 1999) at 6 pages http://www.tc.columbia.edu/CICE/articles/pwc112.htm
Bob Stewart, Paradigm Shift in Canadian Education (2003, pp.
1-4) at http://www.peace.ca/modellingpeaceeducation.htm
Http://www.bluffton.edu/~mastg/PEACE%20WORKS%20.htm
A person's story of going to a Mennonite grade school and then to a
fundamental Christian US high school and how this experience shaped
her approach to peace education! |
|
|
UNIT
ONE 3. Challenge to Peace Education (in the current school systems) |
C. 9 |
C
5, 8, 9 |
I will present a summary of CBIE’s (2002) - are schools part of the problem? |
(Passi,
2003) 3 challenges to peace ed (1 page) http://www.prasena.com/public/peace/9.htm |
|
|
UNIT
ONE 4. How schools need to change - a new paradigm for peace |
C 4 |
C 11 |
|
http://www.perfectfit.org/CT/giroux1.html
(Hit the Role of Schools button - 1 page) Shapiro (2000) Peace or Hate? (What a peaceful educ looks like) http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/index.cfm/action/tikkun/issue/tik0001/article/000115f.html
(4 pages) Miller & Ramos (2000) Transformative peace ed (13 pages) at http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~vmiller/transout.htm |
|
Unit
Two
- 3 classes Peace Education as a Philosophy |
|||||
|
|
UNIT
TWO 1. Different conceptualizations of peace over time, religions, famous people and through the peace movement |
|
C 2 |
|
GFDD 6656 Reader (peace movement) |
|
|
UNIT
TWO 2. What is peace and what are the 6 strategies of peace (one being peace education)? |
|
C 1 |
|
Which
way to peace? At http://www.ppu.org.uk/learn/peaceed/pe_which.html
|
|
|
UNIT
TWO 3. What is peace education (goals, values, attitudes, principles, etc)? |
|
C 1 |
KON monograph http://www.kon.org/leadership/peace.html (Part 1) |
GFDD
6656 Reader (Hicks, Toh, Fisk, Peace Education Network) The Nature of Peace Ed (Hicks) at http://www.ppu.org.uk/learn/peaceed/pe_which1.html
UNESCO 1995 Educ for Peace, HR and democracy - read pp.7-14 at http://www.unesco.org/education/nfsunesco/pdf/REV_74_E.PDF
UNICEF (1999) Peace Education http://www.unicef.org/girlseducation/PeaceEducation.pdf
(See table of content for aims - pp. 22-24) Hoepper (2002) Peace Education in Queensland as a key learning area (includes creating a peaceful classroom and practicising peace) - Relevant material is from pp 1-22) http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/yrs1_10/kla/sose/pdf/rp_pce02.doc |
|
|
UNIT
TWO 4. What is NOT peace education but is related to it (global ed, etc |
|
C 3 |
|
David
Selby Click on Table 1 Global Ed Key Areas http://www.citizens4change.org/global/intro/toc.htm#
UNICEF (1999) Peace Education http://www.unicef.org/girlseducation/PeaceEducation.pdf (See Section 2) |
|
Unit
Three
No classes since we did this in the other course Peace Education as a Knowledge Base |
|||||
|
|
1. Collection of general concerns forming a conceptual base for peace education: violence, conflict, justice, rights, war and defence, security, non-violence, responsibilities, |
|
C 6 |
|
GFDD
6656 Reader http://www0.un.org/cyberschoolbus/peace/home.asp
In the left column, there are five units Click on Holistic peace at http://www.amshq.org/positions/index.html |
|
Unit
Four
5 classes Peace Education as a Process |
|||||
|
|
UNIT
FOUR 1. What are the five types of knowledge and how does one’s choice of a specific type of knowledge affect their peace pedagogy? |
|
|
|
Five kinds of knowledge (Bing, 2002) http://courses.lib.odu.edu/engl/jbing/cp1.html |
|
|
UNIT
FOUR 2. What are seven new types of knowledge related to peace? |
|
|
|
Seven
new kinds of knowledge for peace education - Summary of Morin (Passi,
2003) http://www.prasena.com/public/peace/9.htm
|
|
|
UNIT
FOUR 3. Pedagogical approaches relevant to peace education transformative, critical pedagogy, reflective, progressive education,
contextual learning, critical/creative thinking,
collaborative/cooperative learning, constructivist, participatory,
global, emancipatory, democratic, dialogical, empowerment, political
change agent See Betty Reardon at http://www.peace2.uit.no/hefp/labyrinth_newspaper/labyrinth_2_8.html |
C 10 |
C
4 10 |
Short
pieces by Dr. McGregor (to be sent via e-mail I think) on contextual
learning, transformative learning, critical science pedagogy, critical
and creative thinking |
Fabulous
site on contextual learning http://www.bgsu.edu/organizations/ctl/navigation/
(Click on CTL constructs in left column) Critical pedagogy (Giroux, 1999) at Http://www.perfectfit.org/CT/giroux1.html
One pager on critical peace pedagogy at http://construct.haifa.ac.il/~cerpe/abs/shapiro.html
Transformative peace (Ardizzone, 2001) at http://www.tc.columbia.edu/CICE/articles/la141.htm
Educational ideologies (near end of Hick’s article at http://www.ppu.org.uk/learn/peaceed/pe_which.html
Constructivist learning http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/sc5model.htm
Collection of articles on democratic classrooms at http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/democratic/front_democratic.htm
Democratic classes |
|
|
UNITS
FOUR 4. Peace education curriculum and course design issues (separate
course, infusion, etc) |
|
C 5 |
Handout on basic curriculum design models and approaches to designing curricula |
Toward a peace ed curriculum (Hicks) at http://www.ppu.org.uk/learn/peaceed/pe_ednetcurriculum.html |
|
|
UNIT
FOUR 5. Peace teaching strategies (instructional methods and processes) stemming from different pedagogies used to create a peaceful classroom or learning experience: value and moral reasoning, participatory domain and affective domains of learning, collaborative teaching, problem solving, stress management, build self confidence/esteem, listening, reflection, conflict resolution, dialogue, consensus, asking Socratic questions |
C
7 C 8 |
C
4, 5, 7, 10 |
|
UNESCO
1995 Educ for Peace, HR and democracy - read pp.7-14 http://www.unesco.org/education/nfsunesco/pdf/REV_74_E.PDF
UN Peace ed content, strategies etc (see units at left of page) http://www0.un.org/cyberschoolbus/peace/frame.htm
Hoepper (2002) Relevant material is In Section 6.1 and 6.2)
http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/yrs1_10/kla/sose/pdf/rp_pce02.doc Use as a resource http://lovon.com/peace.html#c |
|
Unit
Five Independent Reading about Maintaining One’s Strength as a Peace Educator |
|||||
|
|
UNIT FIVE |
|
C 5 |
|
Bring your own ideas for this topic |
Resources
http://www.un.org/cyberschoolbus/peace/content4.htm
(Detailed list of UN peace related documents, covenants etc)
Canadian
Peace Education Foundation at http://www.peace.ca/foundation.htm
Educating
for Peace resources http://www.global_ed.org/e4p/rm_teachers.htm
Choose
Chapter 2 - What is Peace? http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE14.HTM#FULL
VERY DETAILED - use as a resource.
Evaluation Scheme (4 components)
Class
participation is
worth 15% and a guideline for what constitutes participating in class
will be distributed to you. This mark may also include some critical
analysis assignments to be handed in. A lecture/seminar approach will
be used to shape the dialogue in class so you have to do the readings and have
reflected on each of them separately and in relation to each other
(comparative analysis) BEFORE class.
Lead
a Seminar
Groups
of students will be lead a one hour class seminar on selected topics/chapters
from the textbook. This presentation, and preparatory notes, is also part of
class participation. Chapters 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 will comprise the seminars,
respectively: (a) peace education as empowerment for social change, (b) moral
development, (c) controversial dimensions of peace education (7 issues), (d)
overcoming the culture of war in schools, and (e) five pedagogical approaches
for peace education that surpass all other approaches. (25%)
A
Glossary of key
pedagogical approaches for a peaceful classroom will be compiled, using the
list below. More may be added. Each entry should be 400 words, minimum
(if using WP, block text, click on file, properties and then information to
get a word count). Try to put as many of these in your own words as possible.
You can cut and copy from the web if you reference the material. This must be
completed by March 10th . Value 30%.
transformative learning,
critical pedagogy,
reflective pedagogy,
progressive education,
contextual learning,
critical thinking,
creative thinking
collaborative learning
cooperative learning,
constructivist approach and constructivism
participatory approach,
global perspective,
emancipatory approach,
democratic classroom,
dialogical approach
empowerment approach,
political change agent (participatory domain of learning)
Class
Dialogue on Peace Pedagogy in Action (30%)
As you
prepare for our dialogue on peace pedagogy in action in the classroom,
ask yourself this question for each of the terms in the glossary: “When
applying ---- in the classroom, I would:” Prepare a written report
to consult during the class dialogue, passing the report into me at the end of
class for evaluation.
For
example,
When
applying a critical science approach in the classroom, I would:
•
teach using
themes and issues instead of just content. I would not go in with a
developed lesson plan for content but rather a description of the process to be
used to ensure critical learning. I would teach the nuances of a broad,
universal concept (e.g., Rights) and then facilitates the students’’
selection of issues that can be analyzed from this broader level. This way,
students learn concepts and appreciate contexts related to a recurring problem
in society!
•
prepare learning
plans with the students instead of making lesson plans up by myself. Then,
the lesson would be about constructing a broad universal concept rather than
just transmitting knowledge/facts, which may still be needed to construct the
concept. Learning plans are a way to share power, foster a sense of ownership
and commitment since they are developed with joint planning and participation.
•The
students would pose their own problems instead of me giving them
pre-determined questions or directing them to problems already formulated in
their textbooks or me telling them what issues will be addressed. The problem
posing approach to eeducation is a process of asking questions, exploring a
range of answers, and developing a critical perspective. By introducing or
fostering the posing of specific questions, the teacher encourages the students
to make their own conclusions about the values and pressures of society. http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/sci_edu/cook-sather.html#practice
http://literacy.kent.edu/Oasis/Pubs/0300-8.htm
• I would also use authentic assessment tools. The student decides, at the end of the course, if they learned! This means that normative evaluation controlled by the teacher (true and false, fill in the blank, multiple choice, etc tests) has to be supplemented with authentic assessment tools controlled by the learner (portfolios, rubrics, project based learning, assessment mapping, service learning, student led conferences, alternative grading techniques).